Thursday, 15 January 2015

Write a note on the role of press in the Independence War of 1857


In the annals of our freedom struggle, the 1857 War of Independence represents a bold and desperate attempt of the people of the Sub-Continent to wrest freedom from foreign rule. Wearied of the inexorable, ruthless and predatory domination of the East India Company for over 100 years, they resolutely plunged in the move to throw off the yoke of the alien rulers. However, when the armed struggle failed, not only the soldiery but the press which had made a significant contribution in it inevitably bore the brunt of
British vengeance.
During the critical days of the War of Independence, the press supported the freedom fighters, although by no means it was free. Indeed, with the advent of the Company rule, it lost all the freedom and independence it had enjoyed during the Mughal rule.
Before analyzing the role of journalism in the War of Independence, we will see first the characteristics of press during the 1857 War of Independence which are following :

1. Hold of Britishers Over the Press :
The English newspapers published in the Sub-Continent were both, weekly and daily. But these English newspapers were owned by “Anglo-Indians” or Britishers. So naturally, they supported British government on "every-national or international issue. They opposed the British government only if they'had any personal problem with the British government. Otherwise, they were the supporters of the British government.

2. Local Newspapers :
All the local newspapers which were published in the local languages of Sub-Continent were weekly newspapers, published round about 6,000 and 30 to 40 thousand readers.

3. Non-Muslim Majority :
Urdu local newspapers were owned mostly by non-Muslims. It was the reign of Bahadur Shah Zafar. So in Delhi, all the newspapers were owned by Muslims but these papers were very few although they were the supporters of the Muslim King.

4. Balanced Muslim Majority :
Muslim newspapers were very reserved in their attitude towards “British-government”. They presented their views very carefully without using any harsh words. On the other side, whenever Muslim newspapers criticized the British government then their criticism was compensated with the flattering of East India Company which continued for many weeks. Because it was the fact that economically, the Muslim empire
was weaker and it was not in the condition to support the Muslims and their newspapers while many newspapers even were given the financial aid by British government so they could not displease the British government.

The Role of Press Before the Revolution

Before the revolution of 1857, the press was performing the following role :

Pen-Newspapers :

Pen-newspapers were handwritten newspapers which were distributed among the readers or sometimes a person loudly read the newspaper by standing on a particular place. In 1800, a person had issued pen-newspapers in great numbers for the purpose of gaining the favour of people against the British government.

Objectives of Pen-Newspapers:

Pen-newspapers or handwritten newspapers had following objectives :

1. To Motivate the Passion of Fight :
The main objective of pen-newspapers was to motivate the passion of fight in the people and let them to participate in the War of Independence for their own country and for Mughal empire. As we know, all the newspapers of Delhi were the supporters of Mughal King, Bahadur Shah Zafar was against the British government, so pen-newspapers tried to develop hateful feelings among the people of Sub-Continent against
the East India Company.

2. War Against the Britishers :
Pen-newspapers played a very important role before the War of 1857. They developed hateful feelings among the people and realized them that the only way of living freely is to be rescued from the British government, otherwise they will become the slaves of Britishers.

3. Criticism on the Government :
Pen-newspapers criticized the government very frequently. They criticized the British government along-with the officials of the British government.

4. Effects of Pen-Newspapers :
Mutiny was the soul of pen-newspapers and it was included in their objectives to prepare the people for war with Britishers and get their country free from the hold of Britishers. Effects of pen-newspapers can be known by the statements of British officials.

5. Sir John Malcom :
He described the reasons behind the Mutiny of 1857 by saying that Pen-newspapers played very important role in developing the hateful feelings in the people for East India Company and made them to participate in the Mutiny of 1857.”

Lord Orcland :
“Whenever we are in tension, pen-newspapers adopted aggressive attitude towards us without any favour or support and created more problems for us.”

6. Lord Macauly :
In 1836, a member of governor general, Lord Macauly wrote in a note that “only from Delhi, 120 pen-newspapers were sent to the different cities of Sub-Continent which criticized the government directly including the role of officials and their activities without any fear. Their purpose was only to criticize the British government on one hand and motivate the people against us on other side.”

By analyzing these statements, we can understand easily the effects of pen-newspapers over the British government and the people of Sub-Continent also.

English Press :
In the beginning of 1857, prejudiced attitude of the English press came on the surface. It demanded to curtail the ‘freedom’ of local press. When the War of Independence started, English press claimed that it was the result of that freedom which local press enjoyed.
The English owned press displayed the worst type of racialism and openly raised the cry a [a guillotine against the freedom-fighters and the vernacular press, particularly the Urdu press and the Persian press. Lord Canning did not disappoint them. While promulgating the Press Act of 1857, he condemned the Indian newspapers and complimented the European press for their loyalty and intelligence.

Colonial Press Laws against Newspapers :
Governor-General of India Lord Canning enacted a law, by which every newspaper and journal had to obtain a license from the government. The government had the authority to cancel any license. Also, the government acquired the right of censorship by this law.

The first victim of this law was the "Bengal Harkaro. ” The paper was owned by Dwarka Tagore and his friends. The Government canceled its license. And re-issued when editor of the paper was dismissed. Friends of India re-missioned before cancellation of licence. Licence of a Hindu newspaper named The Hindu Intelligence was also canceled under the provision of this law. The Hindu Intelligence was published from Calcutta. Three more newspapers from Calcutta, two owned by Muslims, ‘Doorbeen ’ and
‘Sultan-uI-Akhbar' and one owned by the Hindus, ‘Samachar Sudh Darshan’ were prosecuted. Murtazai, from Peshawar, was alleged to had published a false news item. This paper was banned and the editor was imprisoned. "GuIshan-e-Bahar", a Persian newspaper from Calcutta, was also banned and its printing press was confiscated. Two newspapers from Lahore were ordered to be censored before publication and “Chashma-e-Faiz" from Sialkot. Riaz-ul-Akhbar was censored and later on banned. This newspaper was published from Multan.

Delhi and War of Independence :
At that time, Delhi was not under the rule of Britishers. Newspapers from here propagated the noble cause of the Indians. They kept the public informed about the progress of war. They helped freedom fighters to a great extent. The three main newspapers from Delhi were “Sadiq-ul-Akhbar", "Delhi Urdu Akhbar” (Urdu) and Siraj-ul-Akhbar” (Persian). Siraj-ul-Akhbar was the Court gazette of Bahadur Shah Zafar. At the end of the war, all these newspapers were closed down. Maulvi Muhammad Baqir, the owner of the Delhi Urdu Akhbar, was shot dead.

Muslims Victimization :
After the war, the Muslims were especially victimized by the Britishers and the Hindus came closer to the government. They set up their own presses. In 1853, the total Urdu newspapers were 35 and, in 1857, this number was reduced to only 12. Out of them, six were old and six were new. From these 12 newspapers, only one newspaper was owned by a Muslim.

Anglo-Indian Press :
During War of Independence, Anglo-Indian press was free of any restriction. It was kept inciting the government to take revenge from the natives. Its attitude towards local press was very provocative. Editorials and columns of Anglo-Indian newspapers were harsh and objectionable. In short, Anglo-Indian press was given free hand to write what it wanted.

English-owned Press :
The English-owned press displayed the worst type of racialism and openly raised the cry and hatred against freedom fighters and the vernacular press, particularly the Urdu and Persian. Lord Canning did not disappoint them. While promulgation the Press Act of 1857, he condemned the Indian newspapers and complimented the European press for their loyalty and intelligence.

Victimization of Muslim Press :
During the War of Independence, Muslims were the main point of British and Hindus victimization. So during this period, Muslim press was facing bad times.
During the trial of Bahadur Shah Zafar, English prosecutor Major F.J. Harriet said that the “mutiny was the product of a Muslim conspiracy and almost universally the Muslims were regarded as the formentors of the revolt and its chief beneficiaries and, that the press and palace hatched it.” Khawaja Hasan Nizami and Khan Bahadur Shams-ul-ulema, Muhammad Ziikaullah both have cited the name of “Sadiq-ul-Akhbar” in this
Maulvi Zakiullah blamed the press and the palace for the conspiracy. He has used highly derogatory language for the freedom-fighters and the press of Delhi, particularly, "Sadiq-ul-Akhbar" edited by the Syed Jamiluddin and “Delhi Urdu Akhbar” was edited by Maulvi Muhammad Baqir. Both the paper were closed down. Maulvi Baqir was executed while Jamiluddin was jailed for three years.
Indeed, the Muslim press was almost annihilated by the British after they regained control of Delhi and other areas in India. This is evident from the fact that while prior to 1953, the total circulation of 35 newspapers was 2,216. In 1858, the circulation of 12 surviving newspapers was 3,223, of these ll belonged to Hindus and only one to Muslims Similarly, in the North-West, the discrimination was pronounced. While the
Murtzai (Peshawar) and Riaz-e-noor (Multan) were banned, Munshi Dinan Chand, the Hindu newspapers magnate of Sialkot was only asked to transfer his establishment to Lahore. By the middle of 1857, the Muslim press was completely wiped out.


nadia nayyab 1 September 2016 at 11:31  

thank you so much you made a big help ....

Post a Comment

  © Blogger template Blue Surfing by Trade Cycle 2014

Back to TOP